Grizzly's Growlings 08/08/05
"Yah-Bah Dab-Bai Du!"
Copyright ©2005 bearmarketcentral.com.
All rights reserved. Please read the disclaimer.
Archives

Greetings once again, to Bears and Bulls alike.

We apologize for the lengthy silence since our last report in April. We've been waiting (and waiting and waiting) for the markets to make a break, any kind of break. Instead, the markets have gone a net-nowhere so far this year. The DJIA opened 2005 at 10,783. It closed Friday (08/05/05) at 10,558, down a negligible two percent for the year so far. The Nasdaq and the S&P 500 are up a few percentage points apiece.

For that matter, the markets haven't moved much over the past 18 months. The DJIA is almost exactly where it was on opening day 2004. This sideways movement has frustrated and confounded both bears and bulls. Not much money has been made on either side.

The DJIA has fallen over 150 points over the last two days (August 4-5). Has the tidal wave has finally turned? Is our long-anticipated next leg of the "Great Bear Market of 2000-200[?]" finally underway? Click here to continue.

"Yah-Bah Dab-Bai Du!"
As a very wise and honored Yogi once remarked, "It's deja vu all over again!" (Yogi Berra, that was.)

By now you've probably heard of the fantastic success of Baidu.com Inc. the tiny Chinese internet search engine company that went public on Friday (08/05/05). Maybe they should have called it "Buy-Do!" BIDU is the symbol and it rocketed 354% on opening day, from its offering price of $27.00 to $122.54.

Baidu.com was the best IPO first-day gain since Selectica Inc.'s 371% gain right at THE top in the Nasdaq in March 2000.

Caveat emptor! What they're not telling you on CNBC is that Selectica is not exactly the desired role model for a hot IPO. What they are not telling you on CNBC is that Selectica crashed immediately following its wild IPO bonanza. The stock plunged from $151.00 to $3.00 in less than one year!

Chart
Selectica Inc crashed immediately following its March 2000 IPO bonanza.

Baidu's market capitalization is now $5 billion, not too shabby for a company with a grand total of $21 million in revenue.

As Baidu.com has demonstrated, the 75% plunge in the Nasdaq from March 2000 to October 2002 did not fully exorcise the bullish demons of Techmania. It's back, stronger than ever, and it has melded with the new-found China Mania. What more could a bull ask for: a Chinese Google. 

Even Fred Flintstone would be able to recognize the parallels and similarities of this latest episode to the tech frenzy of early 2000. We all know what followed back then. Maybe it'll be different this time. "Yah-Bah Dab-Bai Du!"

Despite the overall lack of net progress in either direction over the past 18 months, there remains on Wall Street a remarkable level of optimism and complacency. Many technical indicators are at levels that often follow sharp or long-lived rallies, not long periods of sideways.

If there's one thing all market analysts agree upon, it's that "markets don't move in straight lines." So if they don't move in straight lines, just how do they move? In zigs and zags, or more precisely, in waves. These waves can be quantified and qualified, and used to project the given market's most likely next move. That's where the Elliott Wave Principle comes in.

We'll be the first to concede that in Elliott Wave terms, the market action over the past few months has been messy, to say the least. The waves have twisted and turned in expected fashion several times. But messy market action in and of itself is valuable information, a clear sign of a counter-trend move. The definitive labels for the wave 2 corrective bounce are certainly open to various interpretations, but here's our best count for the DJIA:

Wave 2 took its sweet time and traveled a lot farther than we had envisioned. Nevertheless, it looks as if the DJIA's 150 point drop over the last two trading days (August 4-5) has marked at least a short-term reversal. Indeed, it very well may be the beginning of our long-anticipated next leg of the "Great Bear Market of 2000-200[?]

Consequently, we're maintaining our highest level of financial alert: FULL CRASH WARNING 

"All of the conditions and prerequisites are in place for a 'crash of historic proportion' to happen at any time. Be on the lookout for a magnitude 9.2 shaker on The Street."

Moreover, all of our longer-term bearish indicators remain in place. Please review our illustrated gallery in the January 1st report for details.

To be clear, our crash warning indicator is not a specific timing device, it is a measurement of risk in the system. To repeat our ongoing footnote:

The purpose of our Crash Warning is not to frighten or intimidate. We feel obligated to bring to the table this potentially very serious situation that you'll never hear discussed on CNBC. We want everyone to be aware of the extreme risk at this juncture so you may take whatever steps you may feel necessary.

CAUTION: As we have demonstrated in the past, it's pretty damned difficult to pick market turning points and events in real-time, and we may indeed be wrong again. Invest carefully, at your own risk. Please read the disclaimer.

We think it unlikely, but a burst above the March high of 10,925 would argue for much higher prices.

Stay tuned!

The Economy
The yield curve -- it sounds like something from the hottest NASCAR track. In the 800 mile per hour world of Wall Street, the yield curve is the spread between the two-year and ten-year treasury notes. Currently, the spread is just 24 basis points (24/100th of one percentage point). That's next to nothing. The curve is essentially flat.


http://bonds.yahoo.com/rates.html

Inversion seems imminent, as Sir Alan of Greenspan and His Merry Monetarists seem intent on raising short-term rates at least two more times in the coming months.

As our friends at Elliott Wave International and others have pointed out, every recession in the last 40 years has been preceded by an inverted yield curve.

So what's the big deal about inversion? It's economic upside-down cake. Banks usually "borrow short and lend long." That's how banks make their profit, but it's a losing proposition with an inverted yield curve. There's no incentive to create new debt. Liquidity in the system dries up. The wheels of commerce grind to a halt. And if the inversion persists, the dreaded deflationary cycle kicks in.

Long-time readers of this report know we've been anticipating exactly such a devastating deflationary depression. So how bad might it be? Doug Casey, publisher of the International Speculator newsletter, expects to see the "...Collapse of Western Civilization." No sense in mincing words, Doug.

Economic "Growth"
Despite the historical message of an inverted yield curve, mainstream economists are still wildly bullishness about the economy. One anal-yst recently proclaimed "the economy is rolling along like a freight train." Huh? They're all jazzed about reported growth of 3.4% on an annualized basis.

We don't buy it and we haven't bought it for years. If you've followed Grizzly's Growlings over the years, you know we've been a grinch on the state of the economy. We've harped on the fact that government economic statistics cannot be relied upon to be an absolute, accurate reflection of the state of the economy. This is not out of some dark and dangerous conspiracy, but out of the outdated, obsolete and ineffective methodologies used by the government to measure, calculate and analyze all the data.

The Daily Reckoning
Free daily e-mail updates with a wealth of economic
and market data for bears. Highly recommended.
Click here to view a free sample.

We continue to proclaim that the emperor has no clothes. There is no economic growth.

To see how we come to this conclusion, unfortunately we need to dive head-first into the dismal world of government economic statistics.

The crux of the problem is that virtually all government economic statistics, including economic growth in particular, are adjusted for inflation. The politicians and bureaucrats mean well, really, they do. But their nobility has led them down the slippery slope of statistical manipulation. For at least the last ten years or so, they've fiddled with the figures for the purpose of under-reporting the rate of inflation.

Why would they want to do such a thing? For political gain, of course. They're politicians, aren't they? What they try to do is make things look better than they really are (and then take credit for it all). They want to be able to promise their constituents as many benefits as possible, for as little cost as possible.

OK, so what does this have to do with economic growth? Well, it's basic third grade math.

To calculate economic growth, government economists start with the overall growth in the economy, then they subtract out a rate of inflation. The result is the inflation-adjusted growth rate. Let's look at some numbers:

Overall growth rate:    7.0%
Less inflation:    6.0%
Adjusted growth rate:   1.0%

Now, lets "fudge" the inflation rate down to 2 percent.

Overall growth rate:    7.0%
Less inflation:    2.0%
Adjusted growth rate:   5.0%

Voila, the adjusted growth rate has magically increased to 5%!

So, for every 1% that reported inflation is reduced, adjusted growth increases by 1%. Fudge with the rate of inflation, and you directly affect the bottom line.

But don't take our word for any of this higher math, learn about it for yourself from two masters on the subject, Jim Puplava and John Williams. Jim Puplava is editor and publisher of Financial Sense Online, a "Five Paws" don't miss web site for everything economic and financial. John Williams is an economist and editor of Shadow Government Statistics,

Williams has done all the detailed research and gathered all the evidence. He skillfully charges that the Consumer Price Index has been willfully and deliberately understated for political and economic advantage. Click here to access Jim and John's fact-filled and revealing interview. (Scroll down to July 23.)

Taxes
The most outrageous and egregious problem with the CPI is that it excludes the largest expenditure for the typical American family: taxes! That's right, the bureaucrats and politicians who control the CPI think that dollars you spend on taxes are somehow different from the other dollars in your pocket (or charges on your credit card). They think these ever-increasing expenditures should be exempt from analysis and calculation. What an insult to us taxpayers, you know, the people who pay for it all!

According to the CATO Institute, the median American family spend more on taxes than they do on food, clothing, shelter, medical and transportation combined! Go ahead, add up all the taxes you pay:

  • federal income taxes
     
  • social security taxes
     
  • Medicare taxes
     
  • state income taxes
     
  • state, county and local sales taxes
     
  • property taxes
     
  • capital gains taxes
     
  • dividend taxes
     
  • estate taxes
     
  • transportation taxes
     
  • gasoline taxes
     
  • alcohol taxes
     
  • tobacco taxes
     
  • cell phone taxes
     
  • utility taxes
     
  • cable television taxes
     
  • and on and on, ad nauseum.
     

Just for kicks, break out a microscope and have a look at the fine print on your cell phone bill. Typically, there are 12 different types of taxes, fees, surcharges and/or assessments on your bill, all payable to different taxing authorities. Individually, they're not much, but collectively, the collectivists are taking another 16% of your already heavily-taxed dollars. And don't let them fool you with the euphemisms, they're all taxes, and they're all not included in the CPI.

Savings and Spending
Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. The personal savings rate of Americans hit Absolute Zero in June. Yet personal spending surged 0.8%. Even most mainstream economists agree that this cannot be sustained. The cash tank is empty. The septic debt tank is already overflowing. The real estate re-fi cash machine has already been punched up for the max. There is no more juice to be squeezed from the financial stimulus stone.

According to data gathered by A. C. Nielsen, the TV rating people, 28% of American families "live paycheck to paycheck" and "have no spare cash."

In fact, the consumer has already started to pull back. Consumer debt fell at a 1.7% annual rate in May, the largest drop since 1990. New debt, not income or savings, has been the feedstock for the alleged economic recovery over the past few years. Now that the consumer is slowing down, if not stopping dead in his tracks, the economy should pull back in earnest.

And by the way, Chinese peasants save a reported 25% of their extremely meager earnings.

Advertisement

Did You Know?
Here are some additional factoids and tidbits reflecting the unprecedented bearish potential for the economy, gathered from various sources:

And then there's real estate. . .

Real Estate
It may not pop with the same thunderous thud as did the Nasdaq bubble in 2000, but real estate's time is fast coming to an end. How do we know? As our friends at the Daily Reckoning have reported, state pension funds are loading up on real estate like never before. Governments are usually the last to recognize trends, financial or otherwise. The greatest fool has joined the mania. There's no one left.

The warning signs continue to flash like a six-track railroad crossing. Here's a sampling of the latest data covering the first half of 2005, gathered from various media reports:

In a recent report on CNN, the infamous IMF found that real estate busts cause far more damage to the economy than do stock market busts. We think this time it will be one for the record books.

The Metals
As with stocks, the metals have gone a net nowhere this year, frustrating bears and bulls alike. As discussed in our January annual report, it looked as if the 8-year cycle in gold had topped and was ready to turn down  Our outlook was:

  . . . at this juncture, gold looks and feels as if it is ready to at least take a breather in the $430-$450 area, if not undergo a sizable pull back.

Indeed, gold has bounced around and consolidated this year, mostly in the $420-$440 range.

From the December 2004 peak just above $450 (just a few weeks after the long-delayed launch of the first gold ETF), spot gold traced out a textbook 1-2-3-4-5 wave decline to complete wave A  From the February 2005 low at $413, a lengthy A-B-C-D-E triangle wave B has brought gold back to the $440 area, the upper end of its recent range.

What mostly likely lies ahead is a five-wave decline to around the $360-375 area to complete wave C. The 8-year cycle would still have plenty of downward influence to go (see chart in January annual report), so the wave C low may only be the first leg of the correction. A trade-able bounce may ensue, followed by another drop, to the low $300s.

We think it unlikely, but a burst above the December 2004 high at $453 would argue for much higher prices.

Another reason we're still cautious (short-term) on gold is the persistence of bullish sentiment. For example, there have been recent full page ads in our local newspaper for a national coin dealer, pumping U.S. Gold Eagles. The sub-headline of the ad reads: "Gold sets blistering pace towards predicted $1,500 per ounce." Huh? Blistering pace? It's been more like a snail's pace. $1,500? Let's get through $500 first.

Our summary from the January annual report still holds:

Despite our current caution on metals prices, we know that holding the metals is about much more than making a profit on them. They're a security blanket, a sleep-well-at-night comforter, a nugget of piece of mind. If you're going to stick to your "buy and hold" approach, considering hedging with some puts. Long-term gold holders, if nothing else, just condition yourself to gold potentially dipping back to at least the mid $300s as the US dollar stages a rebound from its deep, four-year plunge.

Chinese Checkers
China has finally broken the ice and begun its long-anticipated currency revaluation process. The 2008 Olympics are just around the corner and the yuan needs to be fully convertible with other major currencies. They'll get there, with plenty of time to spare, and with plenty of profits along the way.

In our April report, we discussed the ever-growing possibility of a direct confrontation between mainland China and its renegade province, Taiwan.

The rhetoric intensified a few weeks ago when a top Chinese general actually threatened to use nuclear bombs not again Taiwan, but against the US! From a July 14 CNN Report: China sends nuke warning to U.S. over Taiwan

BEIJING, China (Reuters) -- A senior Chinese general has warned that China was ready to use nuclear weapons against the United States if Washington attacked his country over Taiwan, the Financial Times newspaper reported on Friday.

"We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ... of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese," he added.

A very scary, but very real, scenario. Will the US stand by its treaties with Taiwan? Could the Chinese military be bluffing? We sure don't know, and it'll take titanium testicles to call their bluff. America and indeed all of the so-called civilized world, will be "all-in."

Advertisement

Far Out, Man
Predicting the stock market is difficult enough. Care to try your hand at predicting earthquakes? There are actually several rational, educated, sane people who read the seismic waves like stock charts, some with a good deal of success. Stan Deyo is one of the foremost quake-callers. He went out on the limb a few days ago, calling for, as Fred Sanford would bemoan, "The Big One."  From Deyo's August 2nd bulletin:

The August 2 RED ALERT is the first of its kind I've ever made in the 11 years of studying seismic event indicators. It is so huge that I almost can't believe my eyes. The importance and severity of this has impressed me more significantly than when I predicted and warned about the coming December 26, 2004 Indonesian events beginning December 22.

Needless to say, an earthquake of epic proportion would be an unmitigated catastrophe, rippling through hundreds of Main Streets across the country, and at least one Wall Street.

"Be Prepared."
-- Boy Scout motto

"Expect the unexpected."
-- Heraclitus  500 BC

Thanks for listening!  -- Grizzly

© 2005 www.bearmarketcentral.com. All rights reserved. Please read the disclaimer.

Recommend this page to a friend
Grizzly's Growlings Archives

Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion in our "Hair of the Bear" Forum.

New commentary is published by Grizzly as market conditions warrant. If you would
like to receive email notification when new commentary is posted, click here

bearmarketcentral.com home page