2003: The "Great Bear Market of 2000-200[?]" Continues
January 01, 2003

© 2003 www.bearmarketcentral.com. All rights reserved. Please read the disclaimer.

Greetings and a hearty "Happy New Year" to Bears and Bulls alike.

The year 2003 is an even 4700 on the Chinese calendar. Starting on our February 4th, 4700 will be the "Year of the Black Sheep."

To those of us in the Western world, a black sheep is "a member of a family or other group who is considered undesirable or disreputable." Unfortunately, we think 2003 has the very real potential to be the most "undesirable" year in American stock market history, at least for the bulls. We think it may be more like the "Year of the Black Bear."

In order to know where we're going, we need to know where we've been, so we'll begin with a review of the carnage inflicted by the "Great Bear Market of 2000-200[?]" in 2002. To state that it was another Year of the Bear is stating the undeniable.

As you've no doubt heard by now, 2002 marked three consecutive down years for the markets, the first time that's happened in 60 years (since 1939-1941). The DJIA has fallen four consecutive years only once before, the infamous Great Depression years of 1929-1932. We'll discuss market sentiment in more detail below, but suffice it to say that the consensus of mainstream Wall Street is that after three losing years, the markets are "overdue" to bounce back. Unfortunately (for the bulls), we beg to differ and we stand firmly in the camp that says 2003 will tie the Great Depression's historic losing streak.

Of the major indices, the Nasdaq Composite led the way lower in 2002 with a 31.5% decline. It was the first time in its 22-year history that the Nasdaq lost ground in three consecutive years. At its year-end close of 1,335, the Nasdaq sits (it's too weak to stand) down a stunning 74% from its March 10, 2000 peak of 5,132.

The S&P 500 followed with a 23.4% loss. All ten of the industry sectors tracked by S&P lost ground for the year, the first time that's happened in the 21 years of sector reporting.

The DJIA held up the best, slipping "only" 16.8% in 2002. Still, it was the DJIA's worst yearly drop since 1977. Only 3 of the 30 DJIA stocks managed a gain for the year: GM, PG and EK.

Indeed, the Great Bear dined at a global smorgasbord in 2002: The DAX in Germany crashed 44%. The FTSE 100 in London and the CAC 40 in Paris both had their worst years ever. The FTSE dropped 24% and the CAC plunged 34%. The Nikkei 225 in Tokyo sagged 19% to a 20-year low. South America's largest market, the Bovespa in Brazil, tumbled 17%. The list goes on and on and on.

The U.S. dollar cratered in 2002, falling 10% against the yen and 18% against the euro. Add the exchange rate losses to the U.S. markets' losses, and many foreign investors are sitting on a 40-50% devaluation of their dollar assets.

According to CBS MarketWatch, 94% of all stock mutual funds lost money in 2002. Lipper & Co. calculates that the average equity mutual fund lost 21% in 2002.

When the bean counters finish tallying the data in a couple of months, 2002 will likely be the first year in 14 to show net fund outflows from equity mutual funds. Bond funds will show over $150 billion in inflows, a record high. (Smells like another bubble about to burst.)

The equity markets' most recent data shows the Great Bear's appetite is still voracious. The DJIA's 6.2% drop last month was its worst December since, ahem, 1931. Let's recall what ensued in 1932: The DJIA tanked another 46% before finally bottomed on June 28, 1932 (at 42.30)! We think a similar fate awaits the DJIA in 2003.

2002 wasn't all red ink for investors. Government bonds soared as interest rates approached absolute zero (more below). The average long-term bond mutual fund gained 5.5% on the year. Yet the interest-rate sensitive Dow Jones Utilities Average lost an unusually sharp 27%. (So much for safety in "conservative" dividend-paying stocks.)

Crude oil futures gained 50%, as the situations in Iraq and Venezuela worsened.

Gold was in the green by 23%, soaring to a five-year high at $348.50. Gold stocks rocketed higher by an average 71%. Gold mutual funds were the best performing sector for the second year in a row. According to preliminary data by Morningstar, eight of the top ten mutual funds in 2002 were gold funds. The other two were members of our Great Bear Funds roster: the Prudent Bear Fund and the Rydex Venture 100 Fund.

Here's the full table of results for our Great Bear Funds in 2002. Quite impressive, I think you'll agree.

The Bear Funds Scoreboard

Fund Ticker 2001 2002 Chg Gain
Comstock Capital Value Fund DRCVX 3.49 4.70 1.21 34.7%
Comstock Strategy Fund  CPFAX 4.33 4.86 0.53 12.2%
Leuthold Grizzly Short Fund GRZZX 10.16 11.27 1.11 10.9%
Potomac OTC Short Fund POTSX 13.33 17.67 4.34 32.6%
Potomac Small Cap Short Fund POSSX 43.12 43.38 0.26 0.6%
Potomac US Short Fund PSPSX 36.10 42.57 6.47 17.9%
ProFunds Bear ProFund BRPIX 37.02 45.26 8.24 22.3%
ProFunds Short OTC ProFund SOPIX 28.64 33.69 5.05 17.6%
ProFunds Short Small-Cap ProFund SHPIX 29.76 37.31 7.55 25.4%
ProFunds UltraBear ProFund URPIX 30.15 41.64 11.49 38.1%
ProFunds UltraShort OTC ProFund USPIX 39.15 56.25 17.10 43.7%
Prudent Bear Fund  BEARX 4.78 7.33 2.55 53.3%
Prudent Safe Harbor Fund PSAFX 9.32 11.69 2.37 25.4%
Rydex Arktos Fund RYAIX 30.53 40.20 9.67 31.7%
Rydex Tempest 500 Fund  RYTPX 68.39 94.38 25.99 38.0%
Rydex Ursa Fund  RYURX 10.52 12.87 2.35 22.3%
Rydex Venture 100 Fund  RYVNX 46.31 69.8 23.49 50.7%

On the Economics Front
It was really pretty simple in 2002. Despite the all-out efforts of Sir Alan of Greenspan & his Merry Monetarists, the economy is still stuck in first gear, if not neutral.


Are we boring you, Sir Alan?

The Fed's unprecedented eleven rate cuts in 2001 (a cumulative 475 basis points) failed to spark anything more than a flicker of recovery. The Fed's last cut, 50 basis points on November 6th, was perhaps the last rate cut arrow in its quiver. It won't make a bit of difference anyway. More grease isn't the answer when pushing on the proverbial string is the problem.

As mentioned in our reports numerous times over the past five years, near-zero interest rates haven't helped Japan recover from its burst real estate bubble, 21 years ago. The U.S. economy is acting every bit as comatose, and the U.S. equity markets are following Japan's example, too.

Aside from appeasing the politicians' need to "do something" about the economy, near-zero interest rates have their negative consequences:

The U.S. trade deficit also has continued to inflate in its own Hindenburg bubble. The deficit has inflated nearly four-fold over the last four years, reaching a colossal $450 billion in the latest twelve months.

Personal bankruptcies have soared. CNN reports there is a shortage of federal bankruptcy judges!

There's one remaining sector that the bulls cite as evidence of continuing strength in the economy: real estate. Housing has been propelled to extreme valuations by the lowest mortgage rates in 40 years, This bubble will burst shortly after the Fed's next interest rate move, which will likely not be a cut but a hike, necessitated to defend the plunging U.S. dollar.

Now given that even the anal-ysts parading across CNBC can see the real estate bubble about to burst, it pains us to agree with them. But the evidence is building day by day:

The Economic Outlook for 2003
We continue to be unequivocally bearish on the U.S. economy as well as the U.S. markets. This is not just another routine bear market for stocks, and it's not just another routine recession for the economy. Unfortunately, the potential for a "3D" scenario, a "devastating deflationary depression," is very real,

The good new is that we can not only survive but actual prosper if (when) the 3D scenario unfolds. Robert Prechter, the world's foremost authority on Elliott Wave technical market analysis, has written his tenth and most important book yet. It's called Conquer the Crash: You Can Survive and Prosper in a Deflationary Depression. It's a Wall Street Journal #1 Business Bestseller.

Here's my standing review of "Conquer the Crash":

"In straightforward language, free of typical Wall Street econo-babble, Bob Prechter builds a bullet-proof case that a deflationary depression of historic proportion is underway. It will devastate the wealth of those who do not read this book and heed its advice. Bob Prechter calmly and rationally lays out the many options a prudent investor should consider at this juncture. Conquer the Crash could save your financial future."

We strongly encourage everyone to read this book. Buy it or check it out at your local library if necessary. The modest price of this book is a true investment in your financial future. If you need to protect your portfolio or if you just need to sleep well at night, you owe it to yourself to read Conquer the Crash.

One of the most astute economists out there is Dr. Kurt Richebacher, former chief economist for Dressner Bank. We generally concur with his poignant perspective. He believes "this is by far the greatest and worst credit bubble that the world has ever seen." Dr. Richebacher elaborates on his outlook in this must-read interview on http://www.investmentrarities.com/12-24-02.html.

The most recent batch of economic indicators offers no evidence whatsoever that a genuine recovery is underway. On the contrary, economic performance continues to deteriorate.

For example, holiday season retail sales were the weakest since they starting tracking such data in 1970. On New Year's Eve, the Conference Board reported that its consumer confidence index "unexpectedly" sank to 80.3 from 84.9 in November, just above the nine-year low of 79.6 reached in October. The economic anal-ysts were looking for the index to rise to about 85.3.

Yet sentiment regarding the economy remains decidedly bullish. According to the Bond Market Association, economists think GDP will grow at a 3.4% rate in 2003. CNN reports that the Wall Street consensus is for 14% growth in the earnings of the S&P 500 companies.

These economists need to get real. They don't get real because if they did, they'd be out of a job. It's just not politically correct to be bearish on the economy. It's bad for business, the business of economic forecasting that is.

We're sure to hear the choir break into their mythical "second half recovery..., second half recovery…" mantra, starting about mid-February.

Indeed, Sir Alan and his Merry Men have gone on record stating the Fed is standing by, ready to put the printing presses into high gear to keep the U.S. economic machinery well-lubricated. Just how worried are they about a deflationary depression?

The Market Outlook for 2003
Global Crossing... Enron... Tyco... Worldcom... Adelphia... Xerox... Vivendi...United Airline…Conseco… Cooked books... Fudged financials...Insider trading... Outright fraud.... The list of bankruptcies and bamboozlings goes on and on and on.

So where and when will it end? We certainly don't know, but you can bet there will be many more "disasters du jour" unfolding in the coming weeks and months. We even expect that a major U.S. state and eventually the U.S. federal government will be found guilty of accounting fraud and of deceiving us taxpayers. It's just a question of when and how much.

If there's one thing all market analysts agree upon, it's that "markets don't move in a straight line " So if markets don't travel in straight lines, just how do they travel? In zigs and zags, or more precisely, in waves. These waves can be quantified and qualified, and used to project the markets' most likely next move. That's where the Elliott Wave Principle comes in.

Quite simply, the wave structure down from the 2000 high just doesn't appear to be complete. Further, it appears that another major down leg is underway. Here's our analysis and outlook for the DJIA the next 12-18 months:

The Great Bear held firm control throughout most of 2002. The buy-the-dippers came out in force in October as the talking heads and anal-ysts parading across CNBC resumed chanting their first mantra: "the bottom is in..., the bottom is in...." We think the Great Bear merely paused to loosen his belt a couple of notches and light up a fine cigar.

As discussed in these pages many times since the March 2000 bubble peak, countertrend rallies such as we saw in October-November are to be expected and even welcomed. These corrective bounces are needed to relieve the oversold conditions created by the primary down trend, thus clearing the way for the next down leg.

Unfortunately (for most market participants as well as for "greater good"), 2003 has the very real potential to produce "The Big One," that 1929-style grand super cycle crash. Indeed, the one thing still eluding this e Great Bear Market is that elusive historic one-day crash. Stay tuned; the potential for a crash will remain high throughout 2003. We'll try and zero in on it as the waves play out their cards in 2003.

As we enter the new year, the markets' greatest fear is that the imminent war in Iraq won't be the quick and dirty cakewalk the politicians are promising. With as much advanced notice as Iraq has received, Saddam Hussein will no doubt have at least a few tricks up his sleeve. There's no point in speculating about exactly what he may have conjured up in his delusional dreams.

In the December issue of Money Magazine, Prudent Bear Fund Manager David Tice lays out his case for "Dow 3000." Among Tice's main arguments:

As this report hits the web site, this must-read article isn't yet online, so if you're not a Money magazine subscriber, check your local library.

On the valuation side of things, stocks remain widely and wildly overvalued. This despite the dramatic plunge in the markets since the top in early 2000. Mainstream anal-ysts pay most of their attention to the S&P 500, so we'll look at what they're looking at, too. The P/E ratio on the S&P 500 stands at 17 (2003 consensus forecast), 33 (trailing twelve-month GAAP), or 50 (trailing twelve-month "core" earnings).

Any way you measure it, stocks are still expensive in terms of earnings valuation. Typically, bear markets beat down stock prices into the 7-10 P/E range before a lasting bottom takes hold.

Bianco Research reports that total U.S. market capitalization stand at just about 100% of the U.S. GDP. This is down from 183% in March 2000, but still well above the 1929 peak of 81%.

Sentiment is Still Striking
It's amazing to say but after nearly three years of the Great Bear Market, most individual investors are "only" bruised and battered, not bloodied, or bearish. Things got a bit hairy in July and October, but by and large the 2002 sell-off was rather orderly. Historic bear markets have never ended with a whimper. At the October lows, the markets exuded virtually none of the panic, capitulation, or blood in the streets that almost always mark a lasting bottom. Unfortunately, we think there's more pain to be absorbed by the brave bulls before they throw in the towel.

For example, market sentiment remains massively bullish. Investor's Intelligence's latest survey of independent stock market newsletters reveals a 50.4% to 24.2% lead for the bulls. Such excessive bullish sentiment is most often seen near market tops, not bottoms. The bear market will bottom when pessimism peaks.

According to this CNN/Money Poll, individual investors are definitely still bullish.

If you had $10,000, where would you invest it for 2003?

 Stocks
 Bonds
 Gold
 Money market
 Blend of any above

Mainstream anal-ysts on The Street are also still bullish (after all these years). See "Most Wall Street strategists see good things for the market in 2003." From this CNN story, here are the past and present forecasts for the S&P 500 from some of the biggest names (and biggest paychecks) on The Street.

Strategist  Firm  2002
target 
2003 
target 
Rich Bernstein  Merrill Lynch  1200  860 
Abby Joseph Cohen  Goldman Sachs  1300-1425  1150 
Doug Cliggott/
Carlos Asilis 
J.P. Morgan  950  800 
Steve Galbraith  Morgan Stanley  1225  1000-1025 
Ed Kerschner  UBS Warburg  1570  1025 
Tobias Levkovich  Salomon Smith Barney  1350  1075 
Tom McManus  Banc of America 1200  1000* 
Ed Yardeni  Prudential Securities  1300  1025 

Joe Battipaglia and his band of Band of Perma-Bulls are also as bullish as ever, They're looking for gains of 8-20% in 2003. Listen to them on CNN.

From within the heart of the Great Bear Market of 2000 - 200[?], now is not the time to abandon the mainstay of our approach, contrarianism.

So, What's and Investor to Do?
What could derail our bearish outlook? That is, what can save the markets in 2003? The politicians can always change the rules of the game, namely eliminate the so-called double taxation of dividend income. Instantly, the worth of all dividend-paying stocks would soar. Money would flood into the markets. Investor confidence would be restored. As the saying goes, "dividends don't lie."

But alas (for the bulls), we think the odds of such a rescue plan are about as great as the Chicago Cubs meeting the Chicago White Sox in next year's World Series. We think the fiscal pressures arising from the war in Iraq will trump the push for the tax cut. (To argue the bull case for a brief moment, we think such concerns are typical of the short-sighted attitudes of most politicians (of both major parties), Clearly, the long-term structural benefits of such a tax cut outweigh any temporary short-term revenue short-falls.

The price of gold should continue to benefit from the weak dollar, the increasing crises around the globe, and some very interesting market dynamics. Gold's dramatic rise above $350 last week may be just the first leg higher of a major advance. There is a good deal of credence behind the conspiracy theorists' claim that a massive short squeeze may be underway. J.P. Morgan/Chase, Citibank and a host of other global mega-conglomerates are wound up in a massive gold derivatives gambit. If things get messy, gold could start surging in $5 and $10 increments, rather than $1 or $2.

So on the equity side of things, what's an investor to do? First and foremost, nowhere is it written that you must be invested in the equity markets all of the time, or at any time. Three percent in a money market account in 2002 looks pretty good compared to the Nasdaq's 31% drubbing, plus you get to sleep nights.

For aggressive investors, the 18 Great Bear Funds we have identified out of an industry of 12,500 funds performed exceedingly well in 2002, as detailed above. They should fare exceedingly well again in 2003.

For speculators, any short-term strength in the markets hold potentially excellent entry points to the short side. Also, the extremely high risk and high volatility "junior" gold stocks hold excellent potential to capitalize on another leg up in gold.

Invest carefully, at your own risk. Please read the disclaimer.

Thanks for visiting www.bearmarketcentral.com and to all we say: "Kung Hei Fat Choy" -- "Wishing You Success and Prosperity" for this Year of the Black Bear. -- Grizzly

P.S. Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion in the new Hair of the Bear Forum.

© 2003 www.bearmarketcentral.com. All rights reserved. Please read the disclaimer.

Printer-friendly version
Recommend this page to a friend
Grizzly's Growlings Archives